'Electoral Integrity,' 'Dependence Corruption,' and What’s New Under the Sun

5 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2014

Date Written: July 18, 2014


This short symposium piece is a response to Justin Levitt's comments on Dean Robert Post's concept of "electoral integrity," which Dean Post recently described in his book, Citizens Divided. It argues that eminent constitutional scholars such as Dean Post and Professor Lawrence Lessig have repackaged interests to support campaign finance laws already rejected by the Supreme Court in an attempt to circumvent those earlier Supreme Court precedents. Should a future liberal Supreme Court rethink cases such as Citizens United, it would be far better from the point of view of coherent doctrine and sound policy for the Court to transparently and forthrightly relate these new arguments to the old, and to explain where the Court went wrong before and what path it should take going forward.

Keywords: campaign finance, Citizens United, dependence corruption, electoral integrity

Suggested Citation

Hasen, Richard L., 'Electoral Integrity,' 'Dependence Corruption,' and What’s New Under the Sun (July 18, 2014). New York University Law Review Online, 2014, Forthcoming, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2479551

Richard L. Hasen (Contact Author)

UCLA School of Law ( email )

3102063103 (Phone)
90095-1476 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics