'Made-Whole' Made Fair: A Proposal to Modify Subrogation in Tennessee Tort Actions

1 Belmont Law Review 71 (2014)

48 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2014

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

This Article proposes the adoption of the “Modified Made-Whole Doctrine Proposal." Part I begins by explaining the roots of the law of subrogation rights and its current jurisprudential inconsistencies. It also explores the relationship between such subrogation rights and the made-whole doctrine in the context of Tennessee tort law as well as how this doctrine would be applied in Tennessee today. Part II briefly outlines some of the general questions regarding Tennessee’s current application of the made-whole doctrine, particularly the unresolved issues surrounding the impact of comparative fault on subrogation rights. These are questions which the author’s suggested Proposal is designed to directly address. The detailed framework of this Proposal, including its five fundamental Principles and their underpinning rules, are set forth at length in Part III. Finally, Part IV concludes by analyzing the practical application of this Proposal throughout the various stages of the litigation process and offers guidance to judges, attorneys, and litigants alike as to how such subrogation disputes can be equitably resolved. In sum, the Modified Made-Whole Doctrine Proposal is meant to provide for the efficient, just application of the made-whole doctrine to subrogation interests with respect to Tennessee’s law of comparative fault.

Keywords: Tennessee Tort Law, Subrogation

Suggested Citation

Day, John, 'Made-Whole' Made Fair: A Proposal to Modify Subrogation in Tennessee Tort Actions (2014). 1 Belmont Law Review 71 (2014) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480597

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
420
Abstract Views
1,559
rank
67,690
PlumX Metrics