Rulemaking's Promise: Administrative Law and Legal Culture in the 1960s and 1970s

51 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2014

See all articles by Reuel Schiller

Reuel Schiller

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Date Written: January 1, 2001

Abstract

This article chronicles the conflict between two of the central policymaking innovations of the 1960s: the rise of both administrative rulemaking and the inclination of courts to review intensely the actions of administrative agencies. In particular, it examines how the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (the D.C. Circuit) reacted to the rise of rulemaking. It also explores how Congress and the agencies themselves responded to both the rise of rulemaking and the judiciary's reaction to it. This narrative demonstrates two things. First, it show that the same desire to reform the administrative state generated both the increase in rulemaking and the more demanding judicial review of agency action. Both the agencies and the judiciary reacted in the way that reformers desired: agencies issued more rules and courts supervised agencies more closely. Yet, the two responses were often contradictory. Vigorous judicial review limited the speed and efficiency of informal rulemaking. Consequently, the reform impulse was frustrated. Second, this article explains the causes of the contentious debate that arose among and within the different branches of the federal government about what the appropriate response to the rise of informal rulemaking should be. A combination of politics, institutional self-interest, and legal culture influenced members of Congress, agency officials, and, particularly, the judges of the D.C. Circuit as they developed strategies for coping with this novel form of administrative action. The article argues that the D.C. Circuit's reaction to the rise of rulemaking illustrates the way in which judges transform the abstract principles that make up legal culture (assumptions, for example, about what a judge's role in a democratic government should be) into actual legal doctrines.

Suggested Citation

Schiller, Reuel, Rulemaking's Promise: Administrative Law and Legal Culture in the 1960s and 1970s (January 1, 2001). Administrative Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2001; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 2001-01. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2482684

Reuel Schiller (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
461
rank
334,247
PlumX Metrics