Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving

16 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2014 Last revised: 2 Sep 2014

See all articles by Amy Salyzyn

Amy Salyzyn

University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law; University of Ottawa - Common Law Section

Date Written: August 19, 2014


Debates about the proper boundaries of a lawyer’s role are far from new. A fresh spin on this old debate, however, has emerged with the "positivist turn" in legal ethics theory. While in legal theory scholarship the label "positivism" carries various nuances and controversies, its use in the legal ethics context is, as a general matter, more straightforward and uniform. Broadly speaking, positivist accounts of legal ethics share a general view that the law owes its normative content to its ability to solve coordination problems and settle moral controversies. This view of the law, in turn, informs a particular view of the lawyer as governed in her actions by the legal entitlements at issue, as opposed to, for example, considerations of morality or justice writ at large.

Because the positivist account grounds a theory of legal ethics in respect for the law, it seems safe to assume that the law governing lawyers is properly viewed as playing a central role in this account. Stated otherwise, the same "fidelity to law" that lawyers must exhibit when, for example, interpreting tax codes to advise clients on structuring financial transactions is presumably also required when a lawyer is interpreting how the rules of professional conduct apply to her situation.

What has not been given much, if any, attention is how the law governing lawyers is different from other types of law and how this difference may be consequential for the positivist account. The law governing lawyers does not simply have the status of law (and therefore, assumes a central role in the positivist account), it also addresses the same subject matter — the proper bounds of lawyer behavior — that legal ethics theory itself purports to address. As a consequence, two of the "typical" questions or challenges lobbied at positivist accounts of law — what to do when: (1) following the law leads to unpalatable outcomes; or (2) the law at issue contains moral terms — give rise to some outstanding questions in the case of positivist legal ethics theory. Below, some very preliminary thought is given to how these puzzles might be "solved." Ultimately, however, the main goal of this Idea is to highlight these issues as ripe for further consideration and critique.

Keywords: legal ethics, positivist turn, law governing lawyers, legal theory

Suggested Citation

Salyzyn, Amy, Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving (August 19, 2014). Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2014, Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2014-18, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2483147

Amy Salyzyn (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur St
Ottawa, Ontario K1N6N5

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics