Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2483775
 


 



Who is Afraid of Investor-State Arbitration? Or Comparative Law?


Jan Kleinheisterkamp


London School of Economics - Law Department; Cornell University - Law School

June 2014

LSE Law: Policy Briefing Paper No. 4

Abstract:     
The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership has been creating expectations and stirring fears ever since it was announced by EU Commission President Barroso and US President Obama in mid-2013. The promise to boost trans-Atlantic economic exchange in the world’s largest free-trade area came along with the aim to “include investment… protection provisions based on the… highest standards of protection that both sides have negotiated to date”. But the reasons given by the EU Commission in favour of including investor state dispute settlement in the TTIP are weak and almost self-defeating. For the EU to sign investment agreements framed along the lines of existing BITs and without proper safeguards would fundamentally change the current law of the Union as regards state liability, especially for legislative acts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 21, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Kleinheisterkamp, Jan, Who is Afraid of Investor-State Arbitration? Or Comparative Law? (June 2014). LSE Law: Policy Briefing Paper No. 4. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2483775 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2483775

Contact Information

Jan Kleinheisterkamp (Contact Author)
London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )
Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
+44 20 7955 7256 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/staff/jan-kleinheisterkamp.htm

Cornell University - Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,571
Downloads: 429
Download Rank: 50,316