The CEO and the Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Deregulation

16 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2014 Last revised: 3 May 2016

See all articles by Sarah C. Haan

Sarah C. Haan

Washington and Lee University - School of Law

Date Written: July 10, 2014

Abstract

Voters increasingly view their consumer activities, not their campaign contributions, as the most meaningful way to participate in politics. In 2014, after it became public that Mozilla’s CEO, Brendan Eich, had made a controversial political donation in a state ballot proposition, consumer pressure led to his resignation. Eich's downfall and the politicization of retail markets means that business leaders are unlikely to respond to McCutcheon v. FEC by embracing transparency with their campaign donations, and also suggests that campaign finance deregulation is causing hydraulic effects that the Court has failed to anticipate. This Essay explores what "economic reprisal" means for business leaders - a significant segment of the so-called "donor class" - when consumers vote at the cash register.

Keywords: campaign finance, McCutcheon, consumer activism, boycott, economic reprisal, NAACP v. Alabama, CEO, donor class, election, First Amendment

Suggested Citation

Haan, Sarah C., The CEO and the Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Deregulation (July 10, 2014). 109 Northwestern U. L. Rev. 269 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2485561

Sarah C. Haan (Contact Author)

Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )

Lexington, VA 24450
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
848
rank
487,745
PlumX Metrics