When Nominal is Reasonable: Damages for the Unpracticed Patent

55 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2014 Last revised: 10 Sep 2014

See all articles by Oskar Liivak

Oskar Liivak

Cornell University - Law School

Date Written: September 9, 2014

Abstract

To obtain a substantial patent damage award via reasonable royalties, a patentee need not commercialize the patented invention; infringement is all that is needed. This surely incentivizes patenting but it disincentivizes innovation. Why commercialize yourself? The law allows you to wait for others to take the risks, and then you emerge later to lay claim to “in no event less than a reasonable” fraction of other people’s successes. Today, it is rational to be a patent troll rather than an innovator.

This troll enabling interpretation of reasonable royalties is wrong as a matter of patent policy and, surprisingly, it is also wrong as a matter of patent history and statutory interpretation. The creation of reasonable royalties by the courts in the nineteenth century did mark a significant change to patent damages but it was nowhere near as sweeping as today’s interpretation would suggest. Up to the mid-1800s, the existing routes to patent damages were stringent, available only to patentees who had already commercialized their patented invention. Courts developed reasonable royalties for budding innovators who were laying the groundwork for innovation but who could not yet satisfy the existing strict routes to patent damages. Those cases never extended reasonable royalties to those who simply sat on their patents waiting to extract payment from others. Starting in the 1970s, reasonable royalties came unmoored from that foundation. Infringement alone, without any commercialization efforts, now creates a presumption of compensable harm and the near guarantee of a substantial payout. Today’s view of reasonable royalties is unsupported by patent history and it in fact sits in tension if not outright conflict with binding Supreme Court cases. Properly understood, some efforts to commercialize are still a necessary element for substantial reasonable royalties. As a result, nominal damages are reasonable for infringement of an unpracticed patent.

Keywords: Patent Law, Patent Damages, Patent Trolls, Reasonable Royalties, Innovation, Commercialization

Suggested Citation

Liivak, Oskar, When Nominal is Reasonable: Damages for the Unpracticed Patent (September 9, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2488690 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488690

Oskar Liivak (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
607-255-1715 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
962
rank
331,674
PlumX Metrics