Do More Patents Mean Less Entry?

47 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2014

See all articles by Henri de Belsunce

Henri de Belsunce

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

Date Written: August 29, 2014

Abstract

This paper investigates the entry decision of a firm into a market that is protected by a patent. It shows how entrants use the possibility to study existing prior art before taking their entry decision. Studying prior art reduces the information asymmetry that arises due to the fact that patent strengths are private information. The paper analyses the incumbent’s incentives to pursue a raising rivals’ cost strategy by excessive patenting. The application of the model shows that the treble damages doctrine reduces the incentives for an incumbent to patent excessively.

Keywords: Strategic Patenting, Cumulative Innovation, Treble Damages, Litigation, Reading Patents, Design-Around

JEL Classification: K41, O31, L12

Suggested Citation

de Belsunce, Henri, Do More Patents Mean Less Entry? (August 29, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2489709 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2489709

Henri De Belsunce (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
1,439
Rank
478,767
PlumX Metrics