On Relationships between Substitutes Conditions

9 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2014

Date Written: September 2, 2014


In the matching with contract literature, three well-known conditions (from stronger to weaker): substitutes, unilateral substitutes (US), and bilateral substitutes (BS) have proven very critical both in theory and practice. This paper aims to deepen our understanding of them by separately axiomatizing the gap between BS and the other two. We first introduce a new "doctor separability" condition (DS) and show that BS, DS, and irrelevance of rejected contracts (IRC) are equivalent to US and IRC. Due to Hatfield and Kojima (2010) and Aygun and Sonmez (2012), we know that US, "Pareto separability" (PS), and IRC are the same as substitutes and IRC. This along with our result implies that BS, DS, PS, and IRC are equivalent to substitutes and IRC. All of these results are given without IRC whenever hospitals have preferences.

Keywords: Bilateral substitutes, Unilateral substitutes, Substitutes, Doctor separability, Pareto separability, Irrelevance of rejected contracts

JEL Classification: C78, D44, D47

Suggested Citation

Afacan, Mustafa Oguz and Turhan, Bertan, On Relationships between Substitutes Conditions (September 2, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2490540 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2490540

Mustafa Oguz Afacan

Sabanci University ( email )

Faculty of Art and Social Sciences
Orhanli Tuzla
─░stanbul, 34956

Bertan Turhan (Contact Author)

Iowa State University ( email )

260 Heady Hall
Ames, IA 50011
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics