Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Evidentiary Rules of Engagement in the War Against Domestic Violence

63 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2014 Last revised: 8 Oct 2016

Erin R. Collins

University of Richmond School of Law

Date Written: September 2, 2014

Abstract

Our criminal justice system promises defendants a fair and just adjudication of guilt, regardless of the character of the alleged offense. Yet, from mandatory arrest to “no-drop” prosecution policies, the system’s front-end response to domestic violence reflects the belief that it differs from other crimes in ways that permit or require the adaptation of criminal justice response mechanisms. Although scholars debate whether these differential responses are effective or normatively sound, the scholarship leaves untouched the presumption that, once the adjudicatory phase is underway, the system treats domestic violence offenses like any other crime.

This article reveals that presumption is false. It demonstrates that many jurisdictions have adopted specialized evidence rules that authorize admission of highly persuasive evidence of guilt in domestic violence prosecutions that would be inadmissible in other criminal cases. These jurisdictions unmoor evidence rules from their justificatory principles to accommodate the same iteration of domestic violence exceptionalism that underlies specialized front-end criminal justice policies. The article argues that even though such evidentiary manipulation may be effective in securing convictions, enlisting different evidence rules in our war on domestic violence is unfair to defendants charged with such offenses and undermines the integrity of the criminal justice system. It also harms some of the people the system seeks to protect by reducing the efficacy of the criminal justice intervention and discrediting those complainants who do not support the prosecution.

Keywords: evidence law, criminal law, criminal procedure, women and the law, domestic violence

Suggested Citation

Collins, Erin R., The Evidentiary Rules of Engagement in the War Against Domestic Violence (September 2, 2014). New York University Law Review, May 2015, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2490698

Erin Collins (Contact Author)

University of Richmond School of Law ( email )

28 Westhampton Way
Richmond, VA 23173
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
198
Rank
130,864
Abstract Views
1,008