Patent Alienability and Its Discontents

54 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2014 Last revised: 27 Mar 2015

See all articles by Hannibal Travis

Hannibal Travis

Florida International University College of Law

Date Written: September 10, 2014


This article analyzes the Innovation Act, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives on a promise to deal with the problem of "patent trolls" or non-practicing entities (NPEs). The article surveys the NPE controversy from a variety of perspectives, including the history and theory of transactions in real property. Part II raises several economic issues relevant to the proposed NPE legislation, including the need for owners to alienate the legally-enforceable rights they acquire, and the dynamic benefits of property alienability notwithstanding short-term administrative costs. Part III describes a decade of reforms that led up to the Innovation Act, with a particular focus on critiques of patent enforcement in general and NPEs in particular. Part IV responds to these concerns by surveying legal doctrines that may blunt the allegedly adverse effects of patent litigation. The article concludes that current efforts may not be as beneficial to innovation as has been advertised. Recent interpretations of the Patent Act of 1952, including CLS Bank and KSR in particular, provide adequate tools with which the courts may address the alleged abuses by NPEs.

Keywords: patents, patent reform, Innovation Act, NPEs, non-practicing entities, PTO, America Invents Act, AIA, economics of property rights, economics of licensing, economics of R&D, research and development

JEL Classification: O34, K11, K14

Suggested Citation

Travis, Hannibal, Patent Alienability and Its Discontents (September 10, 2014). Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Vol. 17, 2014, Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-23, Available at SSRN:

Hannibal Travis (Contact Author)

Florida International University College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics