Effective Aggressiveness and Inconsistencies in the Bijuridical Treatment of Aggressive Behaviour: Mixed Martial Arts, Bullying, and Sociolegal Quandaries

(Spring 2015) 66 University of New Brunswick Law Journal 328

22 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2014 Last revised: 31 Mar 2016

See all articles by Sara Ross

Sara Ross

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law

Date Written: February 1, 2014

Abstract

This paper seeks to address effective aggressiveness and the treatment of aggressive behaviour in the context of MMA in comparison to the balance of the formal Canadian legal landscape. I choose anti-bullying legislation, and its treatment of aggressive behaviour, as a counterexample to the treatment of aggressive behaviour within the MMA regulatory framework. By intertextually linking and superimposing these two categories of legislation, a critical lens drawing on institutional ethnography is applied in order to question and deconstruct the differential treatment of aggressive behaviour and the rationale behind the legislative mixed message sent. The quandary faced within the fabric of the MMA community regarding its own treatment of aggressive behaviour, where it is both reified as well as castigated through anti-bullying advocacy, will also be examined.

Keywords: MMA, Mixed Martial Arts, Bullying, Aggressiveness, Federal law, Ethnography

Suggested Citation

Ross, Sara, Effective Aggressiveness and Inconsistencies in the Bijuridical Treatment of Aggressive Behaviour: Mixed Martial Arts, Bullying, and Sociolegal Quandaries (February 1, 2014). (Spring 2015) 66 University of New Brunswick Law Journal 328, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2495209 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2495209

Sara Ross (Contact Author)

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law ( email )

6061 University Avenue
6061 University Ave
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H9
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
1,027
Rank
414,106
PlumX Metrics