|
SIGN IN
Email
This field is required Password This field is required Sign in
Remember me
Forgot ID or Password?
|
||
Debating Rape MythsHelen ReeceLondon School of Economics - Law Department September 18, 2014 LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 21/2014 Abstract: In a recent article, I argued that the regressiveness of current public attitudes towards rape has been overstated, suggesting that, to a troubling extent, we are in the process of creating myths about myths. The article itself and the arguments contained within it have provoked various responses from feminists. While these responses proceed at times on the basis of misunderstandings or misinterpretations of my argument, they are helpful both in clarifying areas of disagreement and in underscoring some important points of agreement - at times explicitly by accepting, and at other times implicitly by leaving unchallenged, some of my core claims. In what follows, I aim to point out the misunderstandings or misinterpretations, and to clarify both the areas of assent and the areas of dissent in an attempt to move us towards the productive public conversation we believe we want.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: Feminist research, rape, rape law reform, rape myths, Sexual Offences Act 2003 Date posted: December 9, 2014Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||