Constitutional Reasoning in the Italian Constitutional Court
András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich (eds), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming
52 Pages Posted: 22 Sep 2014
Date Written: September 20, 2014
This article deals with the context and methods of constitutional reasoning developed by the Italian Constitutional Court in 40 cases that we have selected for being considered as “leading cases” within the Italian system (until June 2013). This work has been developed within the CONREASON Project, hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg (Germany) and by the Institute for Legal Studies of the Centre for Social Sciences at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest (Hungary), coordinated by András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.
Keywords: Constitutional Court, Interpretation, Constitutional Justice
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation