73 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2014 Last revised: 15 Jan 2016
Date Written: August 31, 2014
“Behavioral Law and Economics” (BLE) is a specialized component of the legal literature that purports to base its conclusions on a branch of economic analysis known as behavioral economics. The central claim of BLE is that by applying findings of behavioral economics to the real world it can provide more accurate assumptions about individual behavior and decision making than neoclassical economics and thus better and more effective policy prescriptions where needed. To date, however, BLE’s claims have been almost entirely a priori, taking certain suggested biases identified in the laboratory experiments by behavioral economists and claiming that they extend significantly to actual consumer behavior and the need for regulation. Yet it is well-accepted that the proper test of the scientific validity of an economic theory is the accuracy of its predictions relative to empirically testable hypotheses, not a priori reasoning or hypothetical extensions. This paper focuses on an area where BLE has been particularly active and even influential — the analysis of consumer use of credit cards. Comparison of the claims of BLE against hypotheses of the traditional neoclassical model of consumer credit use developed over the past century finds that available empirical evidence uniformly rejects BLE’s hypotheses for consumer credit. In short, while behavioral considerations are an important component of economic analysis, its BLE extension to policy in the consumer credit area has not yet proven to be useful.
Keywords: bank overdraft, behavioral law and economics, consumer behavior, credit cards, debit cards, empirical analysis, government policy, interest rates, Juster-Shay model, mortgage loan, payday loan, shrouded fees, transaction interchange fees
JEL Classification: D12, D18, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Durkin, Thomas A. and Elliehausen, Gregory and Zywicki, Todd J., An Assessment of Behavioral Law and Economics Contentions and What We Know Empirically About Credit Card Use by Consumers (August 31, 2014). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 14-46. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2499819 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2499819