Spurious Periodic Autoregressions

22 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2014

See all articles by Tommaso Proietti

Tommaso Proietti

University of Rome II - Department of Economics and Finance

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 1998


The class of periodic autoregressive (PAR) models, suitably extended so as to allow for ‘periodic integration’, has recently found widespread application to economic time series as an alternative to the time‐invariant models available in the literature. An elaborate modelling strategy has been proposed, and new tests for periodic integration have been envisaged, whose empirical performance tends to support the notion that the kind of non‐stationary stochastic dynamics observed in time series arises as a consequence of periodic integration. This paper aims at challenging this view by means of a Monte Carlo experiment: we generate data according to a trend with a seasonality model such that the trend is a random walk with drift and the seasonal component is generated according to a stochastic trigonometric model. It is found that all the fundamental tools of PAR modelling will tend to provide spurious evidence in favour of a periodic model, and conclude that, as long as macroeconomic time series are concerned, PAR models are an overelaborate way of capturing essential features, such as indeterministic trends and seasonals, that are more parsimoniously accommodated by a time‐invariant model.

Keywords: Periodic models, Seasonality, Trend

Suggested Citation

Proietti, Tommaso, Spurious Periodic Autoregressions (June 1998). The Econometrics Journal, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 1-22, 1998. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2500560 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.11002

Tommaso Proietti (Contact Author)

University of Rome II - Department of Economics and Finance ( email )

Via Columbia, 2
Rome, 00133

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics