LIFO Adoption by Industry

28 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2014

See all articles by Micah Frankel

Micah Frankel

California State University, East Bay

Pei Hui Hsu

California State University, East Bay - School of Business & Economics

Date Written: May 1, 2014

Abstract

Prior studies have shown the cluster of Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) adoptions by firms in the same industry. However, it is not clear which factors affect the variation in the use of LIFO among different industries. In this paper, we uses proxies representing different aspects of industries' production/investment opportunity set in an effort to gain insight regarding the variation in the use of LIFO among diverse industries. Among all industry-specific variables, we find that industry-average effective tax rate (both GAAP ETR and cash ETR) significantly affect the tendency of adopting LIFO in industry level. We further find that firms in industry with lower inventory turnover rate and increasing price level are more likely to apply LIFO. In addition, because IFRS prohibit firms from using LIFO on their inventory valuation, we find that firms in the industry with more global business are less likely to use LIFO. Lastly, consistent with positive theory, we find evidence suggesting that firms in industry with higher leverage ratio are less likely to adopt LIFO while firms in industry that rely heavily on CEO compensation are more likely to adopt LIFO.

Suggested Citation

Frankel, Micah and Hsu, Pei Hui, LIFO Adoption by Industry (May 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2504828 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2504828

Micah Frankel

California State University, East Bay ( email )

25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard
Hayward, CA California 94542
United States

Pei Hui Hsu (Contact Author)

California State University, East Bay - School of Business & Economics ( email )

25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard
Hayward, CA CALIFORNIA 94542
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
117
Abstract Views
1,714
rank
294,926
PlumX Metrics