Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Justifying a Revised Voting Rights Act: The Guarantee Clause and the Problem of Minority Rule

39 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2014 Last revised: 17 Dec 2014

Gabriel "Jack" Chin

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Date Written: October 6, 2014

Abstract

In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court invalidated Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required certain jurisdictions with histories of discrimination to “preclear” changes to their voting practices under Section 5 before those changes could become effective. This Article proposes that Congress ground its responsive voting rights legislation in the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause, in addition to the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Court has made clear that the Guarantee Clause is a power granted exclusively to Congress and that questions of its exercise are nonjusticiable. It is also clear from the Federalist Papers and from scholarly writing – as well as from what little the Court has said – that the purpose of the Guarantee Clause is to protect majority rule. That is precisely what was at issue after the Civil War when Congress first used the Guarantee Clause to protect African American votes. As an absolute majority in three states and over forty percent of the population in four others, African Americans possessed political control when allowed to vote; when disenfranchised, they were subjected to minority rule. African Americans are no longer the majority in any state. But in a closely divided political environment, whether African Americans and other minorities can vote freely may be decisive in many elections. For this reason, Congress could legitimately ground a revised Voting Rights Act in the Guarantee Clause, and the Court should treat its validity as a nonjusticiable political question committed by the Constitution to Congress.

Keywords: Voting Rights Act, Guarantee Clause, majority rule, minority rule

Suggested Citation

Chin, Gabriel "Jack", Justifying a Revised Voting Rights Act: The Guarantee Clause and the Problem of Minority Rule (October 6, 2014). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 5, 2014; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 411. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2506356

Gabriel Jackson Chin (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
400 Mrak Hall Dr.
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
520-401-6586 (Phone)
530-754-5311 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Rank
267,214
Abstract Views
798