Arbitration's Discontents: Between the Pernicious and the Precarious

In Mélanges en L'Honneur du Professeur Bernard Audit 581 (2014)

Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-54

32 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2014

See all articles by William W. Park

William W. Park

Boston University - School of Law

Date Written: October 7, 2014

Abstract

Arbitration has become a victim of its own success, as its wider use has triggered a flood of doubt, disapproval and denunciation. In consequence, higher visibility for arbitral proceedings and awards has led to increased criticism, both just and unjust, with respect to arbitrator independence and impartiality. A robust dispute resolution process requires balance between fairness and efficiency, keeping arbitrators free from taint while at the same time reducing the prospect of dilatory tactics aimed at sabotaging proceedings. If litigants hope to have their disputes resolved by intelligent and experienced individuals, criteria for arbitrator impartiality and independence will need to be implemented with sensitivity to nuanced and complex fact patterns.

Keywords: arbitratration, international arbitration, domestic arbitration, arbitrator bias, arbitratral ethics, transnational arbitral standards, realistic and unrealistic ethical standards, arbitration's legal framework

JEL Classification: K33, K39

Suggested Citation

Park, William W., Arbitration's Discontents: Between the Pernicious and the Precarious (October 7, 2014). In Mélanges en L'Honneur du Professeur Bernard Audit 581 (2014), Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-54, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2506702

William W. Park (Contact Author)

Boston University - School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-3149 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
866
rank
286,783
PlumX Metrics