Kadieu: Connecting the Dots – from Resolution 1267 to Judgment C-584/10 P – The Coming of Age of Judicial Review

Avbelj, Fontanelli, Martinico (eds), Kadi on Trial (Routledge, 2014) 7-21

Posted: 10 Oct 2014 Last revised: 23 Oct 2014

See all articles by Filippo Fontanelli

Filippo Fontanelli

University of Edinburgh - School of Law

Date Written: November 30, 2013

Abstract

This chapter compares the most recent judgment with the three previous "Kadi" decisions. It contextualizes the 2013 pronouncement of the Court of Justice of the EU accounting for the incremental developments traceable in the various decisions and opinions of the Advocates General. More specifically, the analysis suggests a mapping of the different standards of judicial review which were discussed in the proceedings and the scholarship, showing how the different decisions and commentaries speak to different standards that can be arranged on a spectrum that goes from absolute deference to de novo review.

Keywords: Kadi, Kadi II, Court of Justice of the EU, Kadi, anti-terrorism, judicial review, monism, dualism, standards of review

Suggested Citation

Fontanelli, Filippo, Kadieu: Connecting the Dots – from Resolution 1267 to Judgment C-584/10 P – The Coming of Age of Judicial Review (November 30, 2013). Avbelj, Fontanelli, Martinico (eds), Kadi on Trial (Routledge, 2014) 7-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2507166

Filippo Fontanelli (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh - School of Law ( email )

Old College
South Bridge
Edinburgh, EH8 9YL
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
283
PlumX Metrics