Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2510290
 


 



Why National Constitutional Courts Should Not Embrace EU Fundamental Rights


Jan Komárek


London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)

October 15, 2014

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 23/2014

Abstract:     
In this paper I argue against national constitutional courts’ welcoming approach to EU fundamental rights. This more recent development is inextricably linked to the broader phenomenon of the displacement of these courts from law and politics in Europe. The paper builds on previous work concerning the place of constitutional courts in the EU, which sought to provide a theoretical basis for what is argued here with regard to the more specific issue concerning EU fundamental rights. In the first part, I will briefly present the background argument, based on a Habermasian idea of the European constitutional democracy. Then I sketch the understanding of fundamental rights, which builds on it. On that basis I finally discuss national constitutional courts’ engagement with EU fundamental rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 9, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Komárek, Jan, Why National Constitutional Courts Should Not Embrace EU Fundamental Rights (October 15, 2014). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 23/2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2510290 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510290

Contact Information

Jan Komárek (Contact Author)
London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) ( email )
Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/staff/jan-komarek.htm
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 839
Downloads: 254
Download Rank: 91,594