Auditor Sensitivity to Real Earnings Management: The Importance of Ambiguity and Earnings Context

40 Pages Posted: 17 Oct 2014 Last revised: 19 Dec 2017

See all articles by Benjamin P. Commerford

Benjamin P. Commerford

University of Kentucky, Gatton

Dana R. Hermanson

Kennesaw State University - Department of Accounting

Richard W. Houston

University of Alabama

Michael F. Peters

University of Maryland

Date Written: December 3, 2017

Abstract

Differentiating real earnings management (REM) from normal business decisions poses a unique challenge for auditors, researchers, and investors. The ambiguity associated with REM, and the fact that REM does not violate GAAP, may explain why its use is on the rise. While some assert that auditors are not, and should not be, concerned with REM, recent research suggests that REM may influence some auditor judgments. Using Correspondent Inference Theory as our theoretical framework, we extend REM research by investigating the ways in which auditors respond to REM and how auditors deal with the intrinsic ambiguity associated with REM. We administer a 3x2 between-subjects experiment to 113 highly-experienced auditors, manipulating the level of ambiguity surrounding the observed REM (Explicit REM, Potential REM, or No REM) and the earnings context in which the client engages in REM (the client beat or missed the consensus earnings forecast). We find that auditors respond to REM by lowering assessments of management tone (i.e., management’s commitment to a culture of high ethical standards), being more likely to discuss the issue with the audit committee, and being less likely to retain the client. Auditors respond to Explicit REM regardless of the earnings context, but respond to Potential (i.e., ambiguous) REM only when the client beats the forecast. Finally, we find that management tone mediates the relation between REM and auditor responses, even after controlling for various audit-related risks. Thus, for auditors, REM appears to be primarily a “people” issue, as REM provides a negative signal about management.

Keywords: Real Earnings Management, Audit, Management Tone, Ambiguity, Correspondent Inference Theory

JEL Classification: M4

Suggested Citation

Commerford, Benjamin P. and Hermanson, Dana R. and Houston, Richard W. and Peters, Michael F., Auditor Sensitivity to Real Earnings Management: The Importance of Ambiguity and Earnings Context (December 3, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2510554 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510554

Benjamin P. Commerford (Contact Author)

University of Kentucky, Gatton ( email )

255 B&E Building
Lexington, KY
United States

Dana R. Hermanson

Kennesaw State University - Department of Accounting ( email )

1000 Chastain Road
Kennesaw, GA 30144
United States
770-423-6077 (Phone)
770-499-3420 (Fax)

Richard W. Houston

University of Alabama ( email )

Culverhouse School of Accountancy 310 Alston, Box 870220
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
205-348-8392 (Phone)
205-348-8453 (Fax)

Michael F. Peters

University of Maryland ( email )

Department of Accounting Van Munching Hall
College Park, MD 20742-1815
United States
301-405-7118 (Phone)
301-405-0359 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
417
Abstract Views
2,364
rank
72,022
PlumX Metrics