How Lame are Lame Ducks?

7 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2014

See all articles by Christopher Koopman

Christopher Koopman

Utah State University - Center for Growth and Opportunity

Matthew D. Mitchell

George Mason University - Mercatus Center

Emily Hamilton

George Mason University - Mercatus Center

Date Written: September 30, 2014

Abstract

A lame duck session of Congress occurs when legislators meet after an election has been held but before the next Congress has taken office. Lame duck sessions are often criticized by the victorious party in the election, and a common critique is that the lame duck members — undisciplined by electoral constraints — vote irresponsibly. There are subtle but statistically significant differences between voting patterns in regular and lame duck sessions, as revealed by analysis of over 50,000 House and Senate roll call votes.

During a lame duck session, members are slightly less likely to side with their own parties and less likely to vote at all. These patterns persist in very lame duck sessions — those that take place following the loss of majority status within a single house. In these sessions, however, a new pattern emerges: House members become more likely to cast bipartisan votes and Senators become less likely to do so. Beyond these voting patterns, it is difficult to say whether members vote more or less “responsibly” during lame duck sessions of Congress. Our analysis supports the primary findings of the existing literature on lame ducks. Past studies have found lame duck legislators to be less likely to indulge most special interests, but others suggest they may be more likely to indulge one particular special interest: their next employers. In this study, we explain how incentives change for lame duck legislators, briefly review past research on lame ducks, and present our statistical findings that support and add to the existing literature.

Keywords: Lame Duck, Congress, Legislators, Vote, Election, Special Interest

JEL Classification: D72

Suggested Citation

Koopman, Christopher and Mitchell, Matthew D. and Hamilton, Emily, How Lame are Lame Ducks? (September 30, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2510878 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510878

Christopher Koopman

Utah State University - Center for Growth and Opportunity ( email )

3525 Old Main Hill
Logan, UT 84322
United States

Matthew D. Mitchell (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )

3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

HOME PAGE: http://meractus.org

Emily Hamilton

George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )

3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
404
PlumX Metrics