More than Class Action Killers: The Impact of Concepcion and American Express on Employment Arbitration

30 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2014

See all articles by Imre S. Szalai

Imre S. Szalai

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law

Date Written: August 16, 2014

Abstract

This Article highlights how two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion and American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant that, although involving class actions, could impact individual employment arbitration proceedings and destabilize the broader legal framework supporting arbitration in the United States. The shrinking scope of judicial review of arbitration agreements should prompt a broader debate about the relationship between the courts and a system of arbitration. If employment arbitration is to have any legitimacy, judicial review of arbitration agreements should be increasing in scope rather than decreasing, to ensure that employees knowingly and voluntarily entered into arbitration agreements.

Keywords: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, arbitration, judicial review, arbitration agreements, employment law, Federal Arbitration Act

Suggested Citation

Szalai, Imre S., More than Class Action Killers: The Impact of Concepcion and American Express on Employment Arbitration (August 16, 2014). 35 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 31 (2014), Loyola University New Orleans College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-16, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2511065

Imre S. Szalai (Contact Author)

Loyola University New Orleans College of Law ( email )

7214 St. Charles Ave., Box 901
Campus Box 901
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
524
Rank
452,224
PlumX Metrics