Democracy Divided: Campaign Finance Regulation and the Right to Vote

89 New York University Law Review Online 17 (2014)

11 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2014 Last revised: 25 Nov 2014

See all articles by Yasmin Dawood

Yasmin Dawood

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 17, 2014

Abstract

In this Essay, I focus on Chief Justice Roberts’ invocation of a new “right to participate” in McCutcheon. I show how this new right of participation subsumes within it the right to vote and the right of individuals to donate to electoral campaigns. By placing the activities of voting and contributing in a common matrix of participation, the Court has, I claim, demoted the right to vote from its usual position as the most fundamental democratic right. It also has the effect of elevating the right to contribute as normatively equivalent to the right to vote. This Essay also contrasts the Court’s deep concern about the participation rights of donors in McCutcheon with its apparent lack of concern about the participation rights of minority voters in Shelby County. The Court’s deployment of this new “right to participate” has significant implications for both the right to vote and campaign finance regulation.

Keywords: democracy, Supreme Court, campaign finance, right to vote, right to participate

Suggested Citation

Dawood, Yasmin, Democracy Divided: Campaign Finance Regulation and the Right to Vote (October 17, 2014). 89 New York University Law Review Online 17 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2511416

Yasmin Dawood (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-946-7829 (Phone)
416-978-2648 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
91
Abstract Views
1,003
rank
306,712
PlumX Metrics