Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decision-Making and Reduce the Litigation Target Zone

Forthcoming, The Business Lawyer

Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 794

53 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2014 Last revised: 31 Oct 2014

See all articles by Leo E. Strine

Leo E. Strine

Government of the State of Delaware - Supreme Court of Delaware; Harvard Law School; University of Pennsylvania Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 2014

Abstract

This article addresses what legal and financial advisors can do to conduct an M&A process in a manner that: i) promotes making better decisions; ii) reduces conflicts of interests and addresses those that exist more effectively; iii) accurately records what happened so that advisors and their clients will be able to recount events in approximately the same way; and iv) as a result, reduces the target zone for plaintiffs’ lawyers.

Keywords: Mergers, Acquisitions, Corporate Law, corporate governance, Delaware, plaintiffs lawyers, securities litigation, financial advisors, conflicts of interests

JEL Classification: G30, G34, G38, K20, K22, K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Strine, Leo E., Documenting the Deal: How Quality Control and Candor Can Improve Boardroom Decision-Making and Reduce the Litigation Target Zone (October 2014). Forthcoming, The Business Lawyer. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2514520

Leo E. Strine (Contact Author)

Government of the State of Delaware - Supreme Court of Delaware ( email )

820 N. French Street
P.O. Box 1997
Wilmington, DE 19801
United States

Harvard Law School ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,093
rank
5,210
Abstract Views
5,960
PlumX Metrics