Enjoining Injunctions: The Case Against Antitrust Liability for Standard Essential Patent Holders Who Seek Injunctions
The Antitrust Source, pp. 1-7, October 2014
8 Pages Posted: 30 Oct 2014
Date Written: October 28, 2014
A standard essential patent (SEP) may give the patent holder market power in the market for an input that technology manufacturers need in order to make their products compatible with each other. Several commentators have argued that, when a patent becomes part of a standard pursuant to an agreement among competitors given in exchange for the patent holder’s promise to license the technology under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, antitrust law should limit the holder’s right to seek an injunction to stop an infringing manufacturer from selling its standardized product. We disagree for two reasons: First, antitrust sanctions are not necessary, given the law of contracts and of injunctions, to avoid harm to consumers and, second, the application of antitrust law in this situation could, by undermining the ability of courts to tailor appropriate remedies, diminish the incentives for companies to innovate and for industries to adopt standards.
Keywords: antitrust law, competition, consumer welfare, contract, eBay, exclusion order, FRAND terms, injunction, innovation, ITC, MercExchange, monetary damages, Noerr-Pennington doctrine, remedies, standard essential patent, SEP, standard-setting organization, SSO, standardization
JEL Classification: K12, K21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation