Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis from a Non-Guidelines State

Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z

44 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2014 Last revised: 25 Aug 2016

See all articles by Rhys Hester

Rhys Hester

PA Commission on Sentencing; University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

Todd K. Hartman

Sheffield Methods Institute

Date Written: October 30, 2014

Abstract

Scholars continue to highlight the need for studies that examine not just whether race matters in criminal sentencing, but also how and when race factors into judicial decision-making. To this end, we provide a test of the "liberation hypothesis," in which judges are thought to be constrained when the case facts are unambiguous and the evidence clearly favors one side. Thus, for the most serious crimes and seasoned repeat criminal offenders, judges will feel little choice but to impose severe punishment regardless of extralegal factors like race. Yet, in more ambiguous contexts, judges are "liberated" from the constraints of extreme severity and criminality; in these instances the door opens for extralegal characteristics such as race to influence the sentencing decision. We test this theory empirically using criminal sentencing data from more than 17,000 criminal offenders in a non-guidelines state (South Carolina). Ultimately, we find patterns consistent with the liberation hypothesis, but which differed across the two outcomes of interest. For the incarceration decision, the "black penalty" varied significantly depending upon the offender’s criminal history. At the lower levels of criminal history blacks were more likely than whites to be incarcerated, and the average difference in the likelihood of incarceration varied by 5 to 7 percentage points. For the sentence length decision, we report a statistically significant interaction between the severity of the offense and race with interesting implications for the liberation hypothesis. Black and white offenders were generally sentenced to similar prison terms at the highest severity levels. For the lower severity levels, however, the difference between whites and blacks was significant but small; the black disadvantage grew monotonically across severity levels up until the sharp decline for the most serious felonies.

Keywords: Sentencing, Racial Disparities, Liberation Hypothesis

Suggested Citation

Hester, Rhys and Hartman, Todd K., Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis from a Non-Guidelines State (October 30, 2014). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2519252 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2519252

Rhys Hester (Contact Author)

PA Commission on Sentencing ( email )

University Park
State College, PA 16802
United States

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities ( email )

420 Delaware St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Todd K. Hartman

Sheffield Methods Institute ( email )

219 Portobello Street
The University of Sheffield
Sheffield, S Yorkshire S1 4DP
United Kingdom
+44 114 222 7122 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://tkhartman.staff.shef.ac.uk/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
174
Abstract Views
1,238
rank
208,642
PlumX Metrics