Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Is the Supreme Court Sometimes Irrelevant?: Race and the Southern Criminal Justice System in the World War Ii Era

81 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2003  

Michael J. Klarman

Harvard University

Abstract

This article considers the impact of Supreme Court criminal procedure decisions on the treatment of blacks by the southern criminal justice system. It considers decisions in the areas of coerced confessions, race discrimination in jury selection, the right to counsel, and the right against mob-dominated trials. The article finds that these Supreme Court rulings had almost no impact. Blacks continued to be almost entirely excluded from juries in criminal cases; law enforcement officers continued to beat black defendants into confessing; and court-appointed white lawyers turned in sham performances. The article also considers the indirect effects of these decisions and the litigation that produced them. Here, the rulings may have been more consequential, in terms of educating blacks about their rights, mobilizing social protest, facilitating NAACP branch-building and fund-raising, and instructing oblivious whites about the egregiousness of Jim Crow conditions. Finally, the article considers why Supreme Court criminal procedure rulings were so much less efficacious (for southern blacks) than contemporaneous Court decisions invalidating the white primary and mandating the admission of blacks to southern public universities.

Suggested Citation

Klarman, Michael J., Is the Supreme Court Sometimes Irrelevant?: Race and the Southern Criminal Justice System in the World War Ii Era. UVA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 01-9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=252071 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.252071

Michael J. Klarman (Contact Author)

Harvard University ( email )

1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Rank
134,265
Abstract Views
2,549