Cut-and-Paste Justice: A Case Comment on Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre

32 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2014

See all articles by Alain Roussy

Alain Roussy

University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law

Date Written: November 21, 2014

Abstract

Can judges simply copy-and-paste, without attribution, vast portions of a party’s factum in their own reasons? At what point does this practice become so egregious that it risks rebutting the presumption of integrity and impartiality from which all judges benefit? This question was put before the Supreme Court of Canada in Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre (2013 SCC 30, [2013] 2 SCR 357). In this case comment, the author reviews the Cojocaru decision and the Court’s analysis, discusses the decision’s shortcomings, considers the main takeaways for various parties, and examines a surprising comment contained in the decision.

Keywords: Cojocaru, copy, reasons, integrity, impartiality, presumption, judicial copying, judicial ethics, legal ethics, Sheppard

Suggested Citation

Roussy, Alain, Cut-and-Paste Justice: A Case Comment on Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre (November 21, 2014). Alberta Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2014, Forthcoming; Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2014-29. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2529091

Alain Roussy (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
78
Abstract Views
461
rank
307,813
PlumX Metrics