Agenda Setting at the FASB: Evidence from the Role of the FASAC
49 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2014 Last revised: 22 May 2018
Date Written: May 18, 2018
I examine the extent to which the FASB’s agenda determination is a function of the contemporaneous priorities expressed by its primary constituents: auditors, preparers, and financial statement users. Using the FASB’s consultation with the FASAC as a lens through which to view constituent priorities, I find evidence that from 1982 to 2001 influence on FASB agenda decisions is concentrated among “Big N” audit firms, whereas from 2002 to 2006 the priorities of financial constituents appear most significant. Across both periods, I find no evidence of significant preparer influence in agenda formation, which is in contrast to their documented role in later stages of standard setting. Collectively, the results contribute to our understanding of the influence of constituents in standard setting and highlight a shift in that influence over time.
Keywords: Standard Setting, FASB, Lobbying, Agenda Formation
JEL Classification: M41, M48
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting Earnings
By Ray Ball, S.p. Kothari, ...
The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting
Conservatism in Accounting - Part I: Explanations and Implications
International Differences in the Timeliness, Conservatism and Classification of Earnings
By Peter F. Pope and Martin Walker
Incentives Versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries, and Implications for Acceptance of IAS
By Ray Ball, Ashok Robin, ...
Corporate Financial Statements, a Product of the Market and Political Processes
Conservatism in Accounting - Part Ii: Evidence and Research Opportunities
A Proposal for Research on Conservatism
Earnings Quality in U.K. Private Firms
By Ray Ball and Lakshmanan Shivakumar