Convention on Cross-Border Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements

Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 7, No 2, pp. 389-403, November 2014

15 Pages Posted: 9 Dec 2014 Last revised: 30 May 2015

See all articles by Chang-fa Lo

Chang-fa Lo

National Taiwan University

Winnie Ma

Bond University - School of Law

Date Written: November 28, 2014

Abstract

The Draft “Convention on Cross-Border Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements” is the result of a series of discussions and deliberations in connection with a research project and multiple arbitration and mediation conferences held in Taipei. The main ideas of this Draft are to recognize the desirability of cross-border enforcement of international mediated settlement agreements (iMSAs), to set forth the enforcement requirements for iMSAs, and to require countries to enforce iMSAs. It defines the scope of iMSAs eligible for cross-border recognition and enforcement to include those iMSAs of commercial matters arising from institutional or ad hoc mediations concluded in a Contracting State other than the Contracting State where its enforcement is sought. It imposes obligations on Contracting States to recognize and enforce iMSAs. The requirements for iMSAs to become eligible for recognition and enforcement are minimal, with some slight differences between iMSAs arising from institutional mediation and iMSAs arising from ad hoc mediation, in order to ensure that these iMSAs are genuinely concluded. The grounds for non-enforcement of iMSAs are also limited to some fundamental problems which would undermine the justifications for enforcing the iMSA. This Draft recognizes parallel and co-existing regimes for enforcing iMSAs. It also requires the protection of confidential information. It expects Contracting States to develop quality assurance mechanisms concerning the provision of mediation services by mediators and organizations providing mediation services, as well as to cooperate with each other and international organizations in promoting technical assistance. In order to appropriately ensure broader jurisdictional coverage, it defines States as including Separate Customs Territories.

Keywords: MSA, mediated settlement agreement, conciliated settlement agreement, EU Directive on Mediation, Model Law on Conciliation, New York Convention

Suggested Citation

Lo, Chang-fa and Ma, Winnie, Convention on Cross-Border Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements (November 28, 2014). Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 7, No 2, pp. 389-403, November 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535497

Chang-fa Lo (Contact Author)

National Taiwan University ( email )

1 Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road
Taipei 106, 106
Taiwan

Winnie Ma

Bond University - School of Law ( email )

Gold Coast, QLD 4229
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
849
Rank
393,805
PlumX Metrics