On the Conceptual Origins of the Law of Unjustified Enrichment in the Draft Common Frame of Reference

European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013

17 Pages Posted: 9 Dec 2014

See all articles by Jack Wright Nelson

Jack Wright Nelson

McGill University - Faculty of Law; National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Book VII of the Draft Common Frame of Reference presents a codification of the law of unjustified enrichment, derived from European jurisdictions and legal traditions. Yet European private law lacks a ‘common core’ concerning unjustified enrichment. Thus the question arises: where did Book VII’s drafters derive their material, and which national jurisdictions are represented therein? Through comparative analysis, this paper aims to clarify the conceptual origins of Book VII, comment on the causes of divergence in this area of law, and consider the future uses of Book VII.

Keywords: Unjustified Enrichment, Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, European Private Law, Comparative Law

JEL Classification: K11, K12, K13

Suggested Citation

Nelson, Jack Wright, On the Conceptual Origins of the Law of Unjustified Enrichment in the Draft Common Frame of Reference (2013). European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535682

Jack Wright Nelson (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )

469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776
Singapore

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
553
Rank
461,101
PlumX Metrics