Game Form Misconceptions Do Not Explain the Endowment Effect
31 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Game Form Misconceptions Do Not Explain the Endowment Effect
Game Form Misconceptions Are Not Necessary for a Willingness-to-Pay vs. Willingness-to-Accept Gap
Date Written: November 30, 2014
Abstract
We test the claim that game form misconception among subjects making choices through the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) value elicitation procedure provides an explanation for the endowment effect, as suggested by Cason and Plott (forthcoming). We employ a design that allows us to clearly identify whether subjects comprehend the incentive properties of a price-list version of the BDM procedure. We find a robust endowment effect, even among those subjects whose elicited valuations for a known monetary value and whose ability to calculate the payoffs resulting from their choices indicate no misconception of the task. We conclude that game form misconceptions alone are unlikely to account for behavioral patterns like the endowment effect.
Keywords: endowment effect, game form misconception, BDM mechanism, experimental methods, replicable audio files of instructions
JEL Classification: C910, D030
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation