Membership Lists, Metadata, and Freedom of Association's Specificity Requirement

Symposium on NSA Surveillance:  Issues of Security, Privacy, and Civil Liberty, 10 ISJLP 327 (2014)

NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-70

40 Pages Posted: 17 Dec 2014

Date Written: December 15, 2014

Abstract

Revelations of massive aggregation of telephone call records by the NSA have led to widespread debate about the legality, effectiveness, and normative desirability of such broad-based government data collection. This article contends that mass collection of so-called “metadata” as a means to investigate associations impinges on the First Amendment right to associate freely. Such programs thus should, like government demands for membership lists of expressive associations, be subjected to First Amendment scrutiny. While the Fourth Amendment has been the focus of much of the debate about metadata surveillance, the right to freedom of association may provide independent and potentially stronger protection against overreaching government metadata mining. This article contends that the First Amendment subjects metadata surveillance to specificity requirements somewhat akin to the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirements and that the NSA’s Section 215 data collection does not appear to meet those requirements.

Suggested Citation

Strandburg, Katherine J., Membership Lists, Metadata, and Freedom of Association's Specificity Requirement (December 15, 2014). Symposium on NSA Surveillance:  Issues of Security, Privacy, and Civil Liberty, 10 ISJLP 327 (2014) , NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-70, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2538639

Katherine J. Strandburg (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Abstract Views
1,059
rank
330,028
PlumX Metrics