Germany

Compatibility of Transactional Resolutions of Antitrust Proceedings with Due Process and Fundamental Rights & Online Exhaustion of IP Rights, pp. 203-247, Bruce Kilpatrick, Pierre Kobel, and Pranvera Këllezi, eds., Springer International Publishing, 2016

Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 14/18

Posted: 21 Dec 2014 Last revised: 12 May 2017

See all articles by Eckart Bueren

Eckart Bueren

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law

Date Written: May 12, 2014

Abstract

Are transactional resolutions of competition law and merger control proceedings such as settlement procedures, leniency, transactions, commitments, and amicable agreements compatible and consistent with due process and fundamental rights of the parties concerned? This question was one of the main topics of the 2014 Congress of the International League of Competition Law (LIDC) in Torino. This paper, the German national report, provides a thorough overview of transactional resolutions in German competition law and merger control proceedings, the main practical and legal issues as well as important recent developments.

After an introduction into the German competition law enforcement landscape, the paper first covers the two transactional elements in administrative offence proceedings, the leniency policy and settlements, followed by a primer on (negotiated) agreements on the further course and outcome in criminal proceedings. After that, the paper deals with settlements in administrative proceedings, especially commitments. It then summarizes important developments concerning the tension between transactional resolutions and private enforcement of competition law in the current German legal framework. This includes in particular recent case law on access to leniency and settlements declarations, followed by a brief outlook on likely changes required by the European Damages Directive. The final part of the paper concerns commitments (remedies) in German merger control proceedings. Concerning all transactional mechanisms, the report explains their legal basis, content, practical application, compatibility with the rule of law, control and transparency as well as options to appeal and/or to rescind.

Keywords: competition law, antitrust law, procedure, settlements, leniency, commitments, transactional resolutions, fundamental rights, rights of defence, equal treatment, access to file, public enforcement, private enforcement, German law, Germany, Europe

Suggested Citation

Bueren, Eckart, Germany (May 12, 2014). Compatibility of Transactional Resolutions of Antitrust Proceedings with Due Process and Fundamental Rights & Online Exhaustion of IP Rights, pp. 203-247, Bruce Kilpatrick, Pierre Kobel, and Pranvera Këllezi, eds., Springer International Publishing, 2016; Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 14/18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2540484

Eckart Bueren (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law ( email )

Mittelweg 187
Hamburg, D-20148
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
586
PlumX Metrics