Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Class Action Myopia

66 Pages Posted: 24 Dec 2014 Last revised: 26 Feb 2016

Maureen Carroll

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: December 23, 2014

Abstract

Over the past two decades, courts and commentators have often treated the class action as though it were a monolith, limiting their analysis to the particular class form that joins together a large number of claims for monetary relief. This Article argues that the myopic focus on the aggregated-damages class action has led to under-theorization of the other class-action subtypes, which serve far different purposes and have far different effects, and has allowed the ongoing backlash against the aggregated-damages class action to affect the other subtypes in an undifferentiated manner. The failure to confine this backlash to its intended target has had a negative impact on the availability of the other class forms, harming the interests of both litigants and the judiciary. In particular, in civil rights cases involving injunctive or declaratory relief, obstacles to class treatment pose a threat to remedial efficacy and the rule of law. Courts, lawmakers, and scholars should therefore engage in a broader analysis that takes into account all of the subtypes set forth in the modern class action rule.

Keywords: Civil Procedure, Complex Litigation

Suggested Citation

Carroll, Maureen, Class Action Myopia (December 23, 2014). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 65, No. 5, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2542303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2542303

Maureen Carroll (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
132
Rank
182,717
Abstract Views
812