Rethinking Intent and Impact: Some Behavioral Realism About Equal Protection

25 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2015 Last revised: 4 Feb 2015

See all articles by Jerry Kang

Jerry Kang

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: January 3, 2015

Abstract

In this Meador Lecture, Prof. Jerry Kang briefly reviews the state of scientific understanding of implicit bias, including its predictive validity of real-world behavior. Invoking a commitment to behavioral realism, he then explores what these findings might mean for equal protection doctrine viewed as a black box "machine." Aspects addressed include intent and impact, the triggers for strict scrutiny, and the underlying functions or purposes of the doctrinal machine. He concludes with suggestions for doctrinal redesign, including more serious scientific investigation about the causes and consequences of ethnic and racial balkanization.

Keywords: Implicit bias, behavioral realism, equal protection, Implicit Association Test, predictive validity, balkanization

Suggested Citation

Kang, Jerry, Rethinking Intent and Impact: Some Behavioral Realism About Equal Protection (January 3, 2015). Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 15-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2544872

Jerry Kang (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-7298 (Phone)
310-206-7010 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
341
Abstract Views
1,264
rank
95,356
PlumX Metrics