Between Description and Prescription: Law, Wittgenstein, and Constitutional Faith

62 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2015 Last revised: 14 Oct 2019

See all articles by Gregory Brazeal

Gregory Brazeal

University of South Dakota Law School

Date Written: December 1, 2017

Abstract

The occasions on which a judge or legal scholar has peered into the depths of the Constitution and found, to her surprise, that the Constitution requires the opposite of her ideological preferences, are extremely rare. Yet judges and scholars continue to present their conclusions as the product of ideologically neutral reasoning, while often criticizing the ideological bias in the reasoning of their opponents.

A Wittgensteinian perspective on the nature of legal discourse can shed light on this puzzlingly persistent state of affairs. Legal discourse, including constitutional argument, is partly defined by the blending of descriptive reasoning about what the law is with prescriptive reasoning about what the law ought to be. To reach a legal conclusion based on a blend of descriptive and prescriptive reasoning, and to phrase this conclusion as purely descriptive, as legal actors habitually do, is not to violate the rules of legal discourse, but to abide by them.

Taking this conception of legal discourse as a starting point, the Article extends Sanford Levinson’s analogy between U.S. constitutionalism and religious faith. Just as we can distinguish at least three attitudes toward a religious belief—fundamentalism, atheism, and non-fundamentalist faith—so we can distinguish at least three analogous approaches to legal and constitutional discourse. Jack Balkin’s Constitutional Redemption illustrates the often neglected possibility of a constitutional faith without fundamentalism.

[An earlier draft of this article appeared on SSRN under the title "Constitutional Fundamentalism."]

Keywords: Formalism, Atheism, Constitutional Faith, Constitutional Theory, Fundamentalism, Jack Balkin, Legal Realism, Legal Theory, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophy of Religion, Faith, Sanford Levinson, Skepticism, Søren Kierkegaard, Theology

Suggested Citation

Brazeal, Gregory, Between Description and Prescription: Law, Wittgenstein, and Constitutional Faith (December 1, 2017). West Virginia Law Review, vol. 120, p. 363 (2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2547088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2547088

Gregory Brazeal (Contact Author)

University of South Dakota Law School ( email )

414 E. Clark Street
Vermillion, SD 57069
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
1,989
rank
202,176
PlumX Metrics