Why Did They Cross the Pacific? Extradition: A Real Threat to Cartelists?

18 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2015

See all articles by Yoshiya Usami

Yoshiya Usami

American Antitrust Institute (AAI)

Date Written: March 20, 2014


On January 31, 2014, the DOJ added trophies to its list of achievements from the more than three-year long investigation into the auto parts cartels. A former president and a vice president of a Japan-based corporation agreed to plead guilty for their participation in a conspiracy to fix the price of auto parts. Including these two individuals, the DOJ has already brought charges against twenty six corporations and twenty nine individuals, most of whom are Japanese nationals. For reasons described in this paper, some Japanese antitrust practitioners are puzzled by this U.S. enforcement against Japanese nationals. Extradition to the U.S. may not have been a real threat. Nonetheless, more than twenty Japanese executives and employees decided to leave Japan to serve prison terms in the U.S. Why did they choose to cross the Pacific? How functional is the DOJ’s extradition tool? This Working Paper focuses on a relatively unfamiliar area for the antitrust community: the usefulness of extradition in the context of cartel enforcement against Japanese nationals who have not voluntarily surrendered to the U.S. jurisdiction.

Keywords: Cartel Enforcement, International, Extradition, Criminal Sanction, Japan

Suggested Citation

Usami, Yoshiya, Why Did They Cross the Pacific? Extradition: A Real Threat to Cartelists? (March 20, 2014). American Antitrust Institute Working Paper No. 14-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2547678 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2547678

Yoshiya Usami (Contact Author)

American Antitrust Institute (AAI) ( email )

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20008-1022
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics