Promoting Innovation While Preventing Discrimination: Policy Goals for the Scored Society

13 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2015

See all articles by Frank Pasquale

Frank Pasquale

Cornell Law School; Cornell Tech

Danielle Keats Citron

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

There are several normative theories of jurisprudence supporting our critique of the scored society, which complement the social theory and political economy presented in our 2014 article on that topic in the Washington Law Review. This response to Professor Tal Zarsky clarifies our antidiscrimination argument while showing that is only one of many bases for the critique of scoring practices. The concerns raised by Big Data may exceed the capacity of extant legal doctrines. Addressing the potential injustice may require the hard work of legal reform.

Keywords: discrimination, privacy, Zarsky, networked identities, data collection practices, big data, surveillance, digital records, consumer credit, algorithms, cyberlaw

Suggested Citation

Pasquale, Frank A. and Citron, Danielle Keats, Promoting Innovation While Preventing Discrimination: Policy Goals for the Scored Society (2014). Washington Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 1413-24, 2014, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2552864

Frank A. Pasquale (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853

Cornell Tech ( email )

111 8th Avenue #302
New York, NY 10011
United States

Danielle Keats Citron

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
320
Abstract Views
2,979
Rank
169,445
PlumX Metrics