Efficient Factor Identification

27 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2015 Last revised: 14 Oct 2015

See all articles by Ravi Sastry

Ravi Sastry

University of Melbourne - Department of Finance

Date Written: October 13, 2015


Of the hundreds of published asset pricing anomalies, few have been properly tested to determine if they are admissible as true risk factors. Anomalies need not be risk factors, but they are often deployed in subsequent empirical tests as if they are. I leverage the equivalence between the linear factor (beta) model and the stochastic discount factor frameworks to show that the usual (Fama-MacBeth) statistical tests do not correspond to the null hypothesis of interest. These tests demonstrate only that the candidate risk factor is a viable trading strategy, in that it possesses a positive risk-adjusted return. I show that it is neither necessary nor sufficient for a risk factor to be a trading strategy, however. The sufficient statistic for whether a set of candidates are true risk factors is the multivariate analog of the Sharpe ratio, which accounts for the covariance structure of the factors. I present an MCMC procedure that efficiently estimates the multivariate Sharpe ratio and provides valid finite-sample inference.

Keywords: factor models, stochastic discount factor, multivariate Sharpe ratio

JEL Classification: G11, G12

Suggested Citation

Sastry, Ravi, Efficient Factor Identification (October 13, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2554008 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2554008

Ravi Sastry (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Department of Finance ( email )

Level 12
198 Berkeley Street
Victoria 3010

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics