Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?

Enzo Rossi, "Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?", Political Theory, 2015, Forthcoming

9 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2015 Last revised: 31 Jan 2015

Date Written: January 25, 2015

Abstract

Is there more to the recent surge in political realism more than just a debate on how best to continue doing what political theorists are already doing? I use two recent books, by Michael Freeden and Matt Sleat, as a testing ground for realism’s claims about its import on the discipline. I argue that both book take realism beyond the Methodenstreit, though each in a different direction: Freeden’s takes us in the realm of meta-metatheory, Sleat’s is a genuine exercise in grounding liberal normative theory in a non-moralistic way. I conclude with wider methodological observations. I argue that, unlike communitarianism (the previous contender for the discipline’s renewal), realism has the potential to open new vistas, though their novelty is, to a large extent, relative to the last few decades: realism is best thought of as a return to a more traditional way of doing political philosophy.

Suggested Citation

Rossi, Enzo, Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit? (January 25, 2015). Enzo Rossi, "Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?", Political Theory, 2015, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2555332

Enzo Rossi (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam ( email )

Department of Political Science
Oudezijds Achterburgwal 237
Amsterdam, 1012 DL
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://uva.academia.edu/EnzoRossi

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
288
PlumX Metrics