Federalism, Elections, Preemption, and Supremacy: The Aftermath of Inter Tribal Council

33 MISS. C. L. REV. 235 (2014). Mississippi College Law Review. (Symposium Issue Reexamining The Voting Rights Act: Where Is Our Nation after Shelby County v. Holder?)

31 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2015 Last revised: 30 Jul 2021

Date Written: October 29, 2014

Abstract

This Note examines Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, a recent United States Supreme Court case dealing with the constitutionality of an Arizona voter identification law. The law required Arizona election officials to reject any application to register to vote that was not accompanied by satisfactory evidence of United States citizenship. The Supreme Court held that Arizona's law conflicted with, and was therefore preempted by, the National Voter Registration Act, but was quick to acknowledge States' rights in the area of elections. Inter Tribal raises interesting issues regarding the extent of federal and state power regarding elections, as well as the Elections Clause and the Supremacy Clause. This case is not limited to Arizona. Rather, Inter Tribal will prove to shape elections, as well as voting rights and procedures nationwide in the immediate future.

Keywords: Federalism, Elections, Elections Clause, Preemption, Supremacy Clause, Voting, Voting rights, Voter ID laws, Constitutional Law, U.S. Constitution

Suggested Citation

Floyd, Graham, Federalism, Elections, Preemption, and Supremacy: The Aftermath of Inter Tribal Council (October 29, 2014). 33 MISS. C. L. REV. 235 (2014). Mississippi College Law Review. (Symposium Issue Reexamining The Voting Rights Act: Where Is Our Nation after Shelby County v. Holder?) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2555990

Graham Floyd (Contact Author)

Mississippi College Law Review ( email )

151 East Griffith Street
Jackson, MS 39201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
431
Abstract Views
929
rank
86,654
PlumX Metrics