Political Regimes and the Future of the First Amendment

Special Issue: Constitutional Politics in a Conservative Era Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Volume 44, 107–139 Copyright r 2008 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited

33 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2015

See all articles by Thomas F. Burke

Thomas F. Burke

Wellesley College, Political Science Department

Date Written: January 27, 2015

Abstract

Fifty years ago the political scientist Robert Dahl concluded that courts are usually in sync with ‘‘the policy views dominant among the lawmaking majorities’’ and thus offer little help to aggrieved minorities (Dahl, 1957, p. 285). In recent years, Dahl’s classic formulation has received renewed attention. This chapter uses the example of the Rehnquist Court’s First Amendment decisions to analyze ‘‘regime politics’’ theory. On religion cases the Rehnquist Court was generally in sync with the socially conservative strain in the Republican Party, but in other First Amendment areas the pattern is far more complex, raising questions about the relationship between conservative judges and the political movements that brought them to office.

Keywords: First Amendment, regime politics, religion

Suggested Citation

Burke, Thomas F., Political Regimes and the Future of the First Amendment (January 27, 2015). Special Issue: Constitutional Politics in a Conservative Era Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Volume 44, 107–139 Copyright r 2008 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2556027

Thomas F. Burke (Contact Author)

Wellesley College, Political Science Department ( email )

106 Central St.
Wellesley, MA 02181
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
455
PlumX Metrics