Will the Real Constitutional Originalist Please Stand Up?

56 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2015

See all articles by Brad Jacob

Brad Jacob

Regent University School of Law

Date Written: February 3, 2007

Abstract

The purpose of this Article, however, is very similar to "To Tell the Truth." Justice Antonin Scalia is widely recognized as the preeminent judicial proponent of the "original meaning," textualist approach to interpreting the United States Constitution. Supporters and opponents of originalism alike credit him as the contemporary Godfather of the originalist movement. 2 But there is another Justice on the Supreme Court, a quiet Justice who rarely speaks during oral argument and not famous for his lectures or books on this topic, who may be as much or more committed to the principles of originalism as Justice Scalia. That Justice, of course, is Clarence Thomas. The proof of a judge's judicial philosophy is found in court opinions; so rather than looking to articles and speeches, the modest purpose of this Article is to play "To Tell the Truth" by examining the evidence of the constitutional decisions written by Justices Scalia and Thomas during their fifteen years on the Supreme Court together 3 in order to ask the question...Will the real original meaning textualist please stand up?

Keywords: Constitution, originalist, textualist, Scalia, Thomas

JEL Classification: K10, K11

Suggested Citation

Jacob, Bradley P., Will the Real Constitutional Originalist Please Stand Up? (February 3, 2007). Creighton Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 596, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2560063

Bradley P. Jacob (Contact Author)

Regent University School of Law ( email )

1000 Regent University Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
United States
757-352-4523 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
496
rank
307,782
PlumX Metrics