Juking Access to Justice to Deregulate the Legal Market
35 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2015 Last revised: 14 Oct 2016
Date Written: October 22, 2015
Study after study has concluded that the United States suffers from a lack of access to justice because most legal issues are addressed without attorney involvement. To better serve Americans who cannot currently afford legal assistance, scholars have argued that corporations should be permitted to offer legal services. England and Australia already allow alternatives to lawyer-owned firms.
Whatever the merits of corporate delivery of legal services, its impact on access to justice has been overstated. The cost of legal services plays a minor role in decisions to not obtain legal assistance. Moreover, many legal services are relatively affordable, and those that are currently cost prohibitive such as complex litigation cannot be delivered ethically at significantly lower prices. Whereas the legal profession has largely assumed that legal services are very valuable and highly sought after, low and middle-income people also appear to not prioritize legal assistance and may not benefit from assistance in some situations.
To expand access to justice, the legal profession should educate the public about common legal problems and reconsider ethical rules that impede attorneys from soliciting business and marketing their services. Legal aid and pro bono resources should be targeted to significant legal problems that cannot be addressed without attorney involvement. Increasing the supply of low cost legal services providers would merely exacerbate existing inequalities in the legal system while failing to address the need for high quality legal representation with respect to complex matters.
Keywords: Access to Justice, Alternative Business Structures, Self-Representation, Lawyer advertising, alternative legal service providers, pro bono, LegalZoom, Slater & Gordon
JEL Classification: K49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation