The Common Thread: Diversion in the Jurisprudence of a Century of Juvenile Justice
22 Pages Posted: 31 Jan 2001
Abstract
A central objective of those who created the juvenile court was to protect young delinquents from the destructive punishments of the criminal justice system. This promotion of juvenile court as a diversion from criminal justice is distinct from more ambitious programs of "child saving" intervention because avoiding harm can be achieved even if no effective crime prevention treatments are available. This essay shows diversion has been an important motive in juvenile justice from the beginning, and the dominant purpose of a separate juvenile court since In Re Gault in 1967. The past thirty years have been the juvenile court's finest hour as a diversion project; the rate of juvenile incarceration has been stable, while incarceration of young adults has soared.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Adjudicatory and Dispositional Decision Making in Juvenile Justice
-
What Do Juvenile Offenders Know About Being Tried as Adults? Implications for Deterrence
-
By Richard E. Redding and Sarah M Shalf
-
Adjudicative Competence in the Modern Juvenile Court
By Richard E. Redding and Lynda E. Frost
-
By Jeffrey Fagan, Aaron Kupchik, ...
-
Juvenile Delinquency: Past and Present
By Richard E. Redding, Naomi Goldstein, ...
-
Adult Punishment for Juvenile Offenders: Does it Reduce Crime?