Blind Analysis as a Correction for Confirmatory Bias in Physics and in Psychology

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Waldman, I. (Eds.), Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions. John Wiley and Sons, Forthcoming

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2563337

32 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2015

See all articles by Robert MacCoun

Robert MacCoun

Stanford Law School

Saul Perlmutter

University of California, Berkeley

Date Written: February 10, 2015

Abstract

Psychologists and other social scientists have increasingly realized the extent to which their data analytic practices are vulnerable to confirmatory biases. In response to similar concerns, physicists have developed various methods of "blind data analysis," in which the analyst is unable to determine the actual substantive results of a study until the main analyses are judged to be complete. We give illustrations from particle physics and cosmology, and offer simulations to illustrate how similar methods might be adapted to common analytic situations in psychology.

Keywords: Confirmation bias; confirmatory bias; data analysis

Suggested Citation

MacCoun, Robert and Perlmutter, Saul, Blind Analysis as a Correction for Confirmatory Bias in Physics and in Psychology (February 10, 2015). Lilienfeld, S. O., & Waldman, I. (Eds.), Psychological Science Under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions. John Wiley and Sons, Forthcoming, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2563337, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2563337

Robert MacCoun (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-721-7031 (Phone)

Saul Perlmutter

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
385
Abstract Views
2,182
Rank
120,189
PlumX Metrics