41 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2015 Last revised: 20 Nov 2015
Date Written: January 31, 2015
This article brings scholarly attention to the blog posts, tweets, updates and other writing on social media that many lawyers generate and many others would consider generating, if they had the time and skill to do so. In the broadest terms, this genre of writing is “public legal writing”: writing by lawyers not for any specific client but for dissemination to the public or through wide distribution channels, particularly the Internet. Legal blogging is a good entry point into public legal writing because legal blog posts often share some analytical features of longer articles alongside conversational conventions typical of writing on social media. Legal blogging is certainly not new, but this article brings new attention to it.
The article begins by reviewing helpful (non-legal) advice from two recent writing guidebooks, Christopher Johnson’s Microstyle: The Art of Writing Little and Roy Peter Clark’s How to Write Short: Word Craft for Fast Times. Primed by the ideas in these books, the article explores the genre of legal blogging through two case studies of legal blog posts in 2014. Finally, the article puts legal blogging into context by addressing its similarities to and differences from traditional legal writing. Legal blogging offers a respite from the formalities of traditional legal writing, but it also brings its own set of expectations and constraints that define the evolving boundaries of this genre.
Keywords: Legal writing, Legal blogging, Blogging, Social media, Rhetoric, Genre, Media theory, Voice
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Romig, Jennifer Murphy, Legal Blogging and the Rhetorical Genre of Public Legal Writing (January 31, 2015). Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, Forthcoming; Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-330. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2563858